An honest starting point.

No model run recorded. This is a working interface prototype, not a published evaluation.

What you’re looking at

Three families of original, hand-authored SVG illustrations follow one shared design brief. They are fixtures for exploring comparison, inspection and placement in a neutral layout. No real model is associated with them. The artwork does not establish model quality, consistency, editability or production readiness.

Compare the same things

Each family uses the same three subjects and 480 × 400 canvas. Studio views use a shared background; context previews use the same fictional product, text and page structure. Whole-set context shows Save in the page and Spend and Grow below as individual assets. Inspect either to see it in the same layout.

What a measured comparison still needs

1. A rights-cleared brief and inputs, acceptance criteria and a predefined sampling policy.
2. Recorded model versions, settings, all attempts and failures, raw outputs and controlled revisions.
3. Actual observed cost and timing, with human cleanup recorded separately.
4. Separate judgments for brief compliance, aesthetic preference and production checks.

Identical-prompt tests and budget-limited optimized workflows must stay distinct. No universal scores or winners are implied here.

About the downloadable files

The demo SVGs contain actual editable vector primitives, with transparent canvases and no embedded raster images. That describes these files only. They are not evidence that a model can produce the same deliverable. Downloads are demonstration assets, not a stock marketplace offering.